飞屋环游记观后感

2022-01-28 观后感

　　《飞屋环游记》讲述了一个老人曾经与老伴约定去一座坐落在遥远南美洲的瀑布旅行，却因为生活奔波一直未能成行，直到政府要强拆自己的老屋时才决定带着屋子一起飞向瀑布，路上与结识的小胖子罗素一起冒险的经历。

　　飞屋环游记观后感【篇一】

　　我知道一个人这一生必须有一个梦想，只有这样我们才有信念将这一生完整的走下去，可是带着梦想遗憾地离开了这个世界，又是何等凄凉的情景?怀揣着它，只能期盼着自己下辈子去完成这个始终还在准备中的梦想。所求之物，到自己闭眼的那一刻还只能远观，这也许就是老者心中的痛，为了妻子这个梦想，他选择了远行，完成这个单纯而又简单的愿望。

　　是的，这部电影就是这么简单的情节，简单的爱情故事，简单的梦想，简单的追求，简单的执着，可是要完成这么多简单却是那么难的一件事，以至于现实中我们都喜欢退却着，我们喜欢找理由，是现实牵绊着我们一直不敢往前走去寻找自己的梦想，简单而又单纯的梦想只能深深的埋藏自己的心底。

　　《飞屋环游记》就是讲的这么简单的一个故事，故事的开始用了长长的四分钟讲述完了他们从相识，到走进婚礼的殿堂，然后牵着手一起走到老，没有声音，也没有跌宕起伏的生活情节，简简单单的从开始到结尾，然后剩下老者就这么默默的守着满屋子的回忆开始自己那沉沉的思念。

　　梦想的实现有时候是有那么一点点艰难，他们一开始存钱就为了那个简单的梦想，可是柴米油盐酱醋茶，一切生活的需要都阻止着他们前行的步伐，一次次的砸存钱罐，一次次的满罐，直到岁月过去，亲爱的她已经坐上了轮椅，开始不了那远行的计划，就这么老去，留下一屋子的梦想和回忆让老者慢慢品味。

　　我知道对于一个快离去的老者来说，要做出这样的决定会是怎样的困难，这个屋子是他们一起建立起来的，他不容得别人就这么轻易进入，于是他下定决心要拖着这个他们建立的家一起远行，他要让在另一个世界的她知道他一直就在努力着。

　　总有那么些人，那么些事喜欢在你登上高峰的时候给你一盆冷水，让你彻底跌入谷底，在这个寻梦的路途中，老者的生活并不是像想象中那么的顺理成章的去实现了梦想，查尔斯出现了，这个在他们生命中的偶像，人们一般对自己的崇拜者不会怀有任何戒备心理的，老者如此，我们亦如此，可是查尔斯善变的脸庞吓着了所有人，老者的梦想路也就开始了那么不平坦。

　　看到那一幕，我心里的防线彻底崩溃了，是怎样的无助让他做出了那样的选择，当罗素让他去救那只鸟的时候，他站在了两个难以抉择的路口，一边是受伤的小鸟被绑住了，可另一边是自己拿承载着满满梦想的房子正在大火的燃烧中，一个个气球的爆炸，一个个心碎的声音也就爆发了出来，他最后选择托着他的小屋离开，他将火扑灭，可是那痛苦的眼神告诉着我们他很内疚眼睁睁看着查尔斯无情的将小鸟带走。

　　他知道自己背叛了罗素，背叛了这段最珍贵的友情，坐在了他日思梦想的地方，可是他却迷失了方向，在这里我特别害怕他会跳下悬崖就这样结束这段生命，那就是最残忍的结局了，可是编剧没有，罗素自己去找小鸟了。他迷茫的回到了那个小屋，试图在里面寻找到一些方向，最后他用了世界上最大的勇气将东西从小屋里扔了出来，他扔的不仅仅是东西，更是对过去的抛弃，他知道是她在另一个世界告诉他应该这么做，梦想实现了，那么我们还要继续的是生活，于是生活又回了来。回到了原点。

　　人们都说，有梦想的地方就会有斗争，也许就是这样的吧，这部影片让我潸然泪下，我知道一切都要简单就好，于是我也决定守着那简单的梦想就这么永远的走下去，也许梦想无人问津，但我相信我也会像老者一样，总会有那么一天，会实现的。

　　飞屋环游记观后感【篇二】

　　In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie “Up” flies high， borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen， a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner， Carl isn’t your typical American animated hero. He’s 78， for starters， and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit， both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It’s as if he were sagging into the earth.

　　Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky， where they go up， up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child， some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered — the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it’s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention， despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices， as each new movie becomes another manifestation of the movie-industry divide between art and the bottom line.

　　In “Up” that divide is evident between the early scenes， which tell Carl’s story with extraordinary tenderness and brilliant narrative economy， and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero， a world-famous aviator and explorer， Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter， Carl meets Ellie， a plucky， would-be adventurer who， a few edits later， becomes his beloved wife， an adult relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes during which the couple dream together， face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of “Wall-E” and the critic’s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in “Ratatouille，” this is filmmaking at its purest.

　　The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson， with whom he wrote the screenplay， are looking back to the silent era， as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to “Wall-E.” Even so， partly because “Up” includes a newsreel interlude， its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in “Citizen Kane.” In this justly famous (talking) montage， Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast， another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work， the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.

　　Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy， Russell (Jordan Nagai)， inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl， forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly duties. But before that happens there are glories to savor， notably the scenes of Carl — having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed — taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it’s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window， the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color.

　　In time Carl and Russell， an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in “Wall-E，” float to South America where they， the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter’s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house， now tethered to his torso， could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero， Muntz， an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl’s balloons.

　　The talking dogs are certainly a hoot， including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman， Alpha (both Mr. Peterson)， not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there’s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined， particularly in a children’s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell， the little boy with father problems， and much like Dug， the dog with master issues， the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K.， O.K.， not a kick， just some gently expressed regret.

　　飞屋环游记观后感【篇三】

　　电影的开头部分像我们讲述了一个温暖的爱情故事，其实就是我们每个人短暂而美好的一生。如果能够这样这样相爱、包容一辈子到老，是一件多么浪漫的事。追忆似水年华，生活的细节中包含这样多的温情和挚爱，这些最珍贵的印记总是占据思绪中最华彩的篇章。只是，往往时间倏然而过，那些曾经的梦想却永远留在想象和期许之中了。所以当我们有梦想的时候，一定记住要一起去实现啊!

　　艾利去世后，垂垂暮年的卡尔始终不能适应没有爱人的日子。每天一个人的生活清冷而孤独，他总会看着小屋中的一切想起艾利。艾利的那本梦想图册是他经常翻阅的东西，物是人非，本来要追求梦想的两个人如今形影单只。原本卡尔想在这样的回忆和遗憾里终老一生，可是这样的日子也成了奢望。开发商为了得到卡尔的这块土地，找借口将卡尔告上法庭，最后卡尔不得不去敬老院。最后的那个夜晚，卡尔老泪纵横，低低地呼唤艾利：“老婆，我该怎么办?”第二天，当敬老院的人来接卡尔时，想到卡尔真的要离开这座承载了无数爱的小屋，卡尔和艾利的梦想不能实现，他也许以后的日子都要失去自由了，我心如刀割。可是奇迹出现了——卡尔抖开巨大的袋子，无数个扎在一起的气球冲天而起，带着小屋飞起来了，飞过城市、田野，飞向高远的蓝天、飞向他们的梦想——仙境瀑布。那一刻，我热泪盈眶。

　　卡尔历尽千难万险终于到达了仙境瀑布，可是他失去了一路上同甘共苦的朋友——小罗、逗逗和大鸟凯文。实现理想的卡尔没有得到快乐，依旧是闷闷不乐，原来自己始终没有走出艾利离开自己的阴影，失去了艾利的自己不过是一具空壳。他再一次翻看艾利的梦想图册，发现在“长大后我要做的事”这一页后面贴了许多两个人在一起时的照片，最后的那一页艾利写到“我只能陪你走这一段，以后属于你的冒险更精彩。”卡尔忽然顿悟，自己重新找到生活的方向快乐起来，才是对艾利最好的祭奠。于是他救出朋友并和他们一起回到家乡过快乐的日子。我想：去仙境瀑布追寻梦想的过程，就是卡尔寻找自我的过程。既然分离是人生的底色，就没有人能够逃脱，无论是主动选择的还是被动接受的，都意味着某种放弃，我们要告别某个人，或者要放弃既定的生活，这让我们无所适从。但是，人生的阅历会让我们发现，这些分离能够让我们放弃依赖，重新审视自己而回到自我，描绘出独特的生命流向而成为真正的自己——破茧而出。

　　和最爱的人一起看看这部片子吧。当那些誓言早已尘封，你会忆起两个人在一起的点点滴滴，想起那些他为你做过的事情，购置的物品，栽种的花草，那些一同走过的日子，在阳光的碎影里熠熠生辉，原来我们现在所拥有的弥足珍贵，看似平凡却芳醇四溢。

　　——献给我的爱人，我们也要这样一直相爱到老。

相关推荐

【飞屋环游记观后感】相关文章：

飞屋环游记观后感500字观飞屋环游记有感10-12